Form SD



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
 
 
FORM SD
Specialized Disclosure Report
 
 
ALIGN TECHNOLOGY, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Delaware
 
0-32259
 
94-3267295
(State or other jurisdiction
of incorporation)
 
(Commission
File Number)
 
(IRS Employer
Identification No.)
 
 
 
 
2560 Orchard Parkway
San Jose, California 95131
(Address of principal executive offices)
(408) 470-1000
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
 
 
Check the appropriate box to indicate the rule pursuant to which this form is being filed, and provide the period to which the information in this form applies:
 
x     
Rule 13p-1 under the Securities Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13p-1) for the reporting period from January 1 to December 31, 2013.





Section 1 - Conflict Minerals Disclosure
ITEM 1.01     Conflict Minerals Disclosure and Report

Align Technology, Inc. (“Align” or the "Company") has determined that conflict minerals are necessary to the functionality or production of a product manufactured by Align; therefore, the Company is filing this specialized disclosure report.
ITEM 1.02     Exhibit
Following the Company's application of appropriate due diligence, Align has filed, as Exhibit 1.02 to this Form SD, the Conflict Minerals Report required by Item 1.01.
Section 2 - Exhibits
ITEM 2.01     Exhibits
Exhibit 1.01    Align’s Conflict Minerals Report as required by Items 1.01 and 1.02 of this form.

Signatures
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the duly authorized.
Align Technology, Inc.
 
 
/s/ Roger E. George
 
Date: June 2, 2014
Name: Roger E. George
 
 
Title: Vice President, Corporate & Legal Affairs and General Counsel
 
 





Exhibit 1.02


CONFLICT MINERALS REPORT OF
Align Technology, Inc.
IN ACCORDANCE WITH RULE 13p-1
UNDER THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
FOR THE REPORTING PERIOD FROM
JANUARY 1 TO DECEMBER 31, 2013


I.
Introduction

This is the Conflict Minerals1 Report of Align Technology, Inc. (“Align”, the “Company,” “we,” “us,” or “our”) prepared for calendar year 2013 (except for conflict minerals that, prior to January 31, 2013, were located outside of the supply chain) in accordance with Rule 13p-1 (“Rule 13p-1”) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Act”). Numerous terms in this Report are defined in Rule 13p-1 of the Act and Form SD and the reader is referred to those sources, and also to Release No. 34-67716 (August 22, 2012) of the Act (the “Adopting Release”) for such definitions.

In accordance with Rule 13p-1, we undertook efforts to determine whether the necessary conflict minerals in our products were sourced from the DRC or a Covered Country. The Company designed its efforts in conformity, with the internationally recognized due diligence framework in the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas 2 ("OECD Due Diligence Guidance") and related Supplements.

The statements below are based on the due diligence activities performed to date and in good faith by Align and are based on the infrastructure and information available at the time of this filing.  There are factors that could affect the accuracy of these statements.  These factors include, but are not limited to, incomplete supplier data or available smelter data, errors or omissions by suppliers or smelters, evolving definition and confirmation of smelters, incomplete information from industry or other third-party sources, continuing guidance regarding the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) final rules, and other issues.

II.
Design of Due Diligence Measures

The Company designed its overall conflict minerals program based on the five-step framework of the OECD Due Diligence Guidance, the Supplement on Tin, Tantalum, and Tungsten, and the Supplement on Gold.

Align’s implementation of the five step framework consists of the following overarching steps which are discussed in further detail in Section III:

Step 1:     Establish strong company management systems
Step 2:     Identify and assess risks in the supply chain
Step 3:     Design and implement a strategy to respond to identified risks
Step 4:     Carry out independent third-party audit of smelter/refiner's due diligence practices
Step 5:     Report annually on supply chain due diligence.

1    The term “conflict mineral” is defined in Section 1502(e)(4) of the Act as (A) columbite-tantalite, also known as coltan (the metal ore from which tantalum is extracted); cassiterite (the metal ore from which tin is extracted); gold; wolframite (the metal ore from which tungsten is extracted); or their derivatives; or (B) any other mineral or its derivatives determined by the Secretary of State to be financing conflict in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (“DRC”) or an adjoining country (“Covered Country” or collectively the “Covered Countries”).
2    OECD (2013), OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Supply Chains of Minerals from Conflict-Affected and High-Risk Areas: Second Edition, OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264185050-en






We relied upon multi-stakeholder initiatives that provide verification processes for conflict-free minerals from smelters or refiners who may provide those minerals to companies in our supply chain. The Company, as a purchaser of component parts, is many steps removed from the mining of conflict minerals; the Company does not purchase raw ore or unrefined conflict minerals, and conducts no purchasing activities directly in the Covered Countries.

III.    Due Diligence Measures Performed

The following describes the measures taken to reasonably determine the country of origin and to exercise due diligence in the mineral supply chain in conformance with the OECD Due Diligence Guidance.

Step 1: Establish strong company management systems

a.
Conflict Minerals Team - Align has established a management system for complying with the applicable rules. Our management system includes the development of a Conflict Minerals Team consisting of personnel from relevant functions such as purchasing, quality manufacturing, legal and accounting. The team is responsible for implementing our conflict minerals compliance strategy. Senior management is briefed about the results of our due diligence efforts on a regular basis.
b.
Conflict Minerals Policy - Align adopted and published a policy establishing the expectations of our suppliers. The policy resides our corporate website. It is periodically reviewed and will be updated, if necessary.
c.
Company level grievance mechanism - As recommended by the OECD Due Diligence Guidance, Align has established a grievance mechanism as a risk-awareness system for conflict minerals issues. All Align internal and external stakeholders can communicate directly and confidentially through www.ethicspoint.com.

Step 2: Identify and assess risks in the supply chain

We performed the following steps as part of our risk assessment process:

a.
Identify products in scope - Our internal cross-functional conflict minerals team reviewed the products that are manufactured to determine those that should be deemed in-scope as described by the Adopting Release.
b.
Conduct Reasonable Country of Origin Inquiry (“RCOI”) - Align utilized the industry-developed EICC-GeSI Conflict Minerals Reporting Template (“CMRT”) to query our suppliers. We requested this information from our Tier 1 suppliers who provide material and components that are within the scope of the Adopting Release. We evaluated the responses from the templates submitted by our suppliers to determine our reporting obligation based on this RCOI.
c.
Identify smelters/processors - Align has and will continue to collect a list of smelters/processors that are in our supply chain by utilizing the CMRT and other industry recognized methods/systems that may evolve.

Step 3: Design and implement a strategy to respond to identified risks

We performed the following steps as part of our risk management plan:

a.
Validate Responses - we reviewed the responses from our suppliers to determine that they are complete and provide the information necessary to identify the content and origin of minerals in our products.





b.
Verify Smelters - As part of the risk mitigation process we compared the list of smelters/processors collected from suppliers and compared it to the conflict-free smelter lists published by the Conflict-Free Sourcing Initiative (“CFSI”).

Step 4: Carry out independent third-party audit of smelter/refiner's due diligence practices

Align is relying on the CFSI’s published lists to verify the conflict-free status of smelters/processors that source from Covered Countries.

Step 5: Report annually on supply chain due diligence
 
Align has determined that a portion of the minerals used to manufacture our products originated from the Covered Countries. Based on our due diligence of the mineral supply chain, we have determined that our products are DRC conflict undeterminable at this time. Accordingly, this Conflict Minerals Report has been filed with the SEC and is available on our website.


I.
Product Determination

On the basis of the measures described above, the Company has determined that all of our products manufactured as of December 31, 2013 are considered to be DRC conflict undeterminable. The Company is making this determination because it does not have sufficient information from suppliers or other sources at this time to conclude otherwise.


II.
Product Description

Products -Align designs, manufactures and markets a system of clear aligner therapy, intra-oral scanners and CAD/CAM (computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing) digital services used in dentistry, orthodontics, and dental records storage. We have two operating segments: (1) Clear Aligner, which consists of our Invisalign System; and (2) Scanners and Services, which consists of our iTero intra-oral scanners and OrthoCAD services.

Processing Facilities - Based on the information received from our suppliers, the following facilities may have been used to process conflict minerals used in our products.

Gold
Aida Chemical Industries Co. Ltd.
Gold
Almalyk Mining and Metallurgical Complex (AMMC)
Gold
Asaka Riken Co Ltd
Gold
Atasay Kuyumculuk Sanayi Ve Ticaret A.S.
Gold
Aurubis AG
Gold
Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (Central Bank of the Philippines)
Gold
Boliden AB
Gold
Caridad
Gold
Cendres & Métaux SA
Gold
Yunnan Copper Industry Co Ltd
Gold
China National Gold Group Corporation
Gold
Chugai Mining
Gold
Daejin Indus Co. Ltd
Gold
DaeryongENC





Gold
Daye Non-Ferrous Metals Mining Ltd.
Gold
Do Sung Corporation
Gold
FSE Novosibirsk Refinery
Gold
Gansu Seemine Material Hi-Tech Co Ltd
Gold
Hwasung CJ Co. Ltd
Gold
Inner Mongolia Qiankun Gold and Silver Refinery Share Company Limited
Gold
Japan Mint
Gold
Jiangxi Copper Company Limited
Gold
JSC Ekaterinburg Non-Ferrous Metal Processing Plant
Gold
JSC Uralectromed
Gold
Kazzinc Ltd
Gold
Korea Metal Co. Ltd
Gold
Kyrgyzaltyn JSC
Gold
L' azurde Company For Jewelry
Gold
Lingbao Jinyuan Tonghui Refinery Co. Ltd.
Gold
Met-Mex Peñoles, S.A.
Gold
Moscow Special Alloys Processing Plant
Gold
Nadir Metal Rafineri San. Ve Tic. A.ª.
Gold
Navoi Mining and Metallurgical Combinat
Gold
OJSC “The Gulidov Krasnoyarsk Non-Ferrous Metals Plant” (OJSC Krastvetmet)
Gold
OJSC Kolyma Refinery
Gold
Prioksky Plant of Non-Ferrous Metals
Gold
PT Aneka Tambang (Persero) Tbk
Gold
PX Précinox SA
Gold
Sabin Metal Corp.
Gold
SAMWON METALS Corp.
Gold
Schone Edelmetaal
Gold
Shandong Zhaojin Gold & Silver Refinery Co. Ltd
Gold
So Accurate Group, Inc.
Gold
SOE Shyolkovsky Factory of Secondary Precious Metals
Gold
The Great Wall Gold and Silver Refinery of China
Gold
The Refinery of Shandong Gold Mining Co. Ltd
Gold
Tongling nonferrous Metals Group Co.,Ltd
Gold
Torecom
Gold
YAMAMOTO PRECIOUS METAL CO., LTD.
Gold
Yokohama Metal Co Ltd
Gold
Zhongyuan Gold Smelter of Zhongjin Gold Corporation
Gold
Zijin Mining Group Co. Ltd
Gold
Guangdong Jinding Gold Limited
Tantalum
Changsha South Tantalum Niobium Co., Ltd.
Tantalum
Shanghai Jiangxi Metals Co. Ltd
Tin
China Rare Metal Materials Company
Tin
CNMC (Guangxi) PGMA Co. Ltd.
Tin
Cooper Santa
Tin
CV Serumpun Sebalai
Tin
CV United Smelting
Tin
EM Vinto
Tin
Fenix Metals
Tin
Gejiu Zi-Li
Tin
Huichang Jinshunda Tin Co. Ltd





Tin
Jiangxi Nanshan
Tin
Kai Unita Trade Limited Liability Company
Tin
Linwu Xianggui Smelter Co
Tin
Liuzhou China Tin
Tin
Metallo Chimique
Tin
Minmetals Ganzhou Tin Co. Ltd.
Tin
Novosibirsk Integrated Tin Works
Tin
O.M. Manufacturing (Thailand) Co., Ltd.
Tin
PT Artha Cipta Langgeng
Tin
PT Babel Inti Perkasa
Tin
PT Bangka Putra Karya
Tin
PT Bangka Tin Industry
Tin
PT Belitung Industri Sejahtera
Tin
PT DS Jaya Abadi
Tin
PT Eunindo Usaha Mandiri
Tin
PT Karimun Mining
Tin
PT Mitra Stania Prima
Tin
PT Prima Timah Utama
Tin
PT REFINED BANGKA TIN
Tin
PT Sariwiguna Binasentosa
Tin
PT Stanindo Inti Perkasa
Tin
PT Tinindo Inter Nusa
Tin
Rui Da Hung
Tin
Soft Metais, Ltda.
Tin
Yunnan Chengfeng Non-ferrous Metals Co.,Ltd.
Tungsten
A.L.M.T. Corp.
Tungsten
Kennametal Huntsville
Tungsten
Guangdong Xianglu Tungsten Industry Co., Ltd.
Tungsten
Chongyi Zhangyuan Tungsten Co Ltd
Tungsten
Dayu Weiliang Tungsten Co., Ltd.
Tungsten
Fujian Jinxin Tungsten Co., Ltd.
Tungsten
HC Starck GmbH
Tungsten
Hunan Chenzhou Mining Group Co
Tungsten
Hunan Chun-Chang Nonferrous Smelting & Concentrating Co., Ltd.
Tungsten
Japan New Metals Co Ltd
Tungsten
Ganzhou Non-ferrous Metals Smelting Co., Ltd.
Tungsten
Ganzhou Huaxing Tungsten Products Co., Ltd.
Tungsten
Kennametal Fallon
Tungsten
Tejing (Vietnam) Tungsten Co., Ltd.
Tungsten
Wolfram Bergbau und Hütten AG
Tungsten
Wolfram Company CJSC
Tungsten
Xiamen Tungsten Co., Ltd
Tungsten
Zhuzhou Cemented Carbide Group Co Ltd
Tungsten
Xiamen Tungsten (H.C.) Co., Ltd.
Tungsten
Ganzhou Seadragon W & Mo Co., Ltd.
All
78 Smelters listed as Conflict Free by the CFSI











VI.    Future Due Diligence

We will continue to communicate our expectations and information requirements to our direct suppliers. We will also continue to monitor changes in circumstances that may impact the facts or our determination. Over time, we anticipate that the amount of information globally on the traceability and sourcing of these ores will increase and improve our knowledge. We will continue to make inquiries to our direct suppliers and undertake additional risk assessments when potentially relevant changes in facts or circumstances are identified. New suppliers will be reviewed for conflict minerals conformance during initial business reviews. If we become aware of a supplier whose due diligence needs improvement, we intend to continue the trade relationship while that supplier improves its compliance program. We expect our suppliers to take similar measures with their suppliers to ensure alignment throughout the supply chain.

In addition to those above, the Company will undertake the following steps during the next compliance period to improve the due diligence conducted and to further mitigate the risk that the necessary conflict minerals do not benefit armed groups, including:

Continue to collect responses from suppliers using tools such as the CMRT.
Compare and validate RCOI results to information collected via independent conflict-free smelter validation programs such as the CFSI.
Inform and encourage suppliers to transition to smelters identified by the due diligence process as “conflict-free” by an independent audit program such as the CFSI.
Continue to allow verified conflict-free material from the region to enter our supply chain.


VII.    Independent Private Sector Audit

Not required for calendar year 2013.